Welcome to the Truck & Bus Forums | |
A very warm welcome to truckandbusforum.com, a completely FREE online community for people worldwide with an interest in vintage and modern trucks and buses. Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more. Please feel free to join by clicking HERE. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
stobart,bought. southend airport.last december.to create an air frieght and rail terminal,depot.hoping to fly frieght directly into. london city airport.my question is? is it a good or bad thing. Stobart having the monoply on the British transport industry.instead of the old nationalised .British Road Serviceces. will it become.Stobart National Road Services.Daventry was his first rail terminal ,a few year ago.they have come a long way since then.
Last edited by Dingbat; 21st July 2009 at 10:35. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
In an ideal World (!) all transport would be provided by the State and run 'economically' to provide options for the public (remember RedStar and luggage-in-advance?).
Sadly, the motivation to make things work didn't seem to prevail and these facilities failed (whether by poor management or intransigence of the workers). Entrepreneurs have evolved that have established themselves (and seem to be swallowing-up competitors). Amalgamation of road transport with rail and air connections makes sense and removing barriers by incorporating these facilities within one umbrella organisation offers potential cost savings - if only through central accounting. The danger (IMO) is that, without good local management, factions will become complacent (because of having a 'monopoly') and cease to operate efficiently, (possibly raising charges to compensate) leaving customers without worthwhile 'logistics'. I have no knowledge or experience of any Stobart operation (other than to see their vehicles on the roads and see photographs here) so my comments are purely speculative. Operators attempting to compete (especially during recessional times) might have difficulty in remaining competitive and solvent. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
As long as (Stobart) operates effectively and efficiently (and the necessary funding is available - either from income or investment for continued acquisition and expansion) then things will probably flourish, however the economic downturn will affect all eventually and pruning and closures will be inevitable.
To some extent, a nationalised industry might continue longer whilst losing money. For private organisations it will depend on the strength of the backing and their confidence to ride-out the storm. (British Airways is said to be losing £1 million per day . . . ) |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
my concern is ,what will happen if or when Stobart have the monopoly.will they dictate the way the transport industry will go.i.e haulage rates[under cut thier competitors],fuel prices [buying in bulk,as they do now].as smaller firms cant keep up with firms like Stobart..also things like supermarket work,i am sure most firms would like to give the in house transport to a third party.as they do a lot of work for tesco,now.regards.
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Once any operator has an absolute monopoly they are free to raise charges to whatever they consider the market will pay (until independant operators see the gap and set up in competition).
Of course the economies of scale may permit lower rates to be charged (thus stifling competition). I doubt that Stobart are interested in local low-volume movements, and probably concentrate on long-term contracts. |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
Two questions, where did the original Eddie Stobart go and is he still involved in the running of the present Stobart company-- sorry 3 questions, where did these 2 guys get the cash to take over Stobart, surely the way this company has flurished in such a short time they must have some influential backers behind them-----I know when I was in business Stobart was the most hated company on the road, undercutting rates and backhanding firms to get business, one man haulage companies could`nt compete and many went under over Mr Eddie in the 60s & 70s.
|
#19
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
http://www.englandsnorthwest.com/inv...velopment.html Last edited by G-CPTN; 23rd July 2009 at 10:56. |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
ceylon 220.i agree stobart,was the most hated man .all the driver,s i knew hadn,t a good word to say about 'steady eddie'.he put some small firms out of the game .by under cutting rates.[ALLEGEDLY].once again ,there were alleged ,rumour,s that the mormons were behind him financially.i know i joke about the stobart driver,s.but thats all they talked about when parked up.new uniforms and the new lorries they were going to be driving.never talked about pay rates.regards.
Last edited by Dingbat; 26th July 2009 at 20:00. |
Bookmarks |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|