Truck & Bus Forum Truck & Bus Forum
07:35
Welcome to the Truck & Bus Forums
Welcome!A very warm welcome to truckandbusforum.com, a completely FREE online community for people worldwide with an interest in vintage and modern trucks and buses.

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Please feel free to join by clicking HERE.

Go Back   Truck & Bus Forum > Truck Forums > Vintage Truck Discussion
Home Register Gallery FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #31  
Old 5th January 2016, 23:13
G-CPTN G-CPTN is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Tynedale
Age: 80
Posts: 3,698
Images: 209
The handbrake will be part of the secondary system.

Brake systems should be designed such that any single failure leaves the vehicle with the ability to 'stop' - albeit with a reduced performance level.

If you lost the 'primary' circuit you would still have reduced footbrake performance (via the servo) and also secondary braking via the handbrake.

Losing the secondary air removes the ability to replenish the spring brake (though you could arrange a double check valve from the primary service reservoir).

Later models would have multiple circuit protection valves guaranteeing air supply when other circuits had 'failed'.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 5th January 2016, 23:27
mylesdw mylesdw is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Christchurch
Posts: 118
That makes a lot of sense; I understand the different failure modes now.

BTW - Happy New Year!
__________________
Cheers
Myles

TK restoration blog: http://www.mig-welding.co.uk/forum/t...dford-tk.43480
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 13th April 2016, 09:20
mylesdw mylesdw is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Christchurch
Posts: 118
Does anyone know the procedure for tightening this nut after replacing the propshaft centre bush. It tightens up exactly between two slots and if you back it off it is not much more than finger tight. Mind you, it was not very tight when I took it apart. Just wondered.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg P1030052.JPG (105.1 KB, 2 views)
__________________
Cheers
Myles

TK restoration blog: http://www.mig-welding.co.uk/forum/t...dford-tk.43480
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 11th July 2016, 20:57
mylesdw mylesdw is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Christchurch
Posts: 118
For the sake of completeness - it's 240 lb/ft and then more to align the split pin; you don't loosen it.
__________________
Cheers
Myles

TK restoration blog: http://www.mig-welding.co.uk/forum/t...dford-tk.43480
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 11th July 2016, 20:59
mylesdw mylesdw is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Christchurch
Posts: 118
Does anyone out in TK land know where the clutch arm return spring is meant to attach? At the rear it clips onto the clutch arm but there is nothing obvious forward of there for it to go onto. Any ideas?
__________________
Cheers
Myles

TK restoration blog: http://www.mig-welding.co.uk/forum/t...dford-tk.43480
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 11th July 2016, 23:17
G-CPTN G-CPTN is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Tynedale
Age: 80
Posts: 3,698
Images: 209
Unfortunately my manual doesn't detail where the spring is anchored, and the illustration that shows it in situ is schematic and not 'realistic'. Is there anywhere within reach of the spring that would be 'obvious'? It could be a bolt head (might there be a bracket under the head of a bolt?).
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 12th July 2016, 01:07
mylesdw mylesdw is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Christchurch
Posts: 118
My manual just shows it 'flying' but it does show a little angle bracket. I guess it must be onto one of the starter mounting bolts. I was looking for an attachment point straight ahead but I notice now that the drawing shows it angled.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Untitled.jpg (11.3 KB, 5 views)
__________________
Cheers
Myles

TK restoration blog: http://www.mig-welding.co.uk/forum/t...dford-tk.43480
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 21st July 2016, 09:40
Royvague Royvague is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: London
Posts: 3
Hello all I have just joined so not sure if this is the right place to ask but.... I have a 1970 km tractor unit with a 466.... I have destroyed the engine.... please dont ask how.... I have a bedford 500 turbo to replace it. The question is, Is it possible / advisable to remove the turbo and replace it with the exhaust manifold from the 466 engine ? Will I also need to swap the fuel pump and compressor...? How will it effect the engine ? Am I wasting my time or should I just find a non turbo unit >? Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 21st July 2016, 10:00
mylesdw mylesdw is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Christchurch
Posts: 118
Why don't you keep the turbo?
__________________
Cheers
Myles

TK restoration blog: http://www.mig-welding.co.uk/forum/t...dford-tk.43480
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 21st July 2016, 10:34
Royvague Royvague is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: London
Posts: 3
I am limited to time It is a working lorry and need it back on the road asap..Keeping the turbo means fabricating a new exhaust etc
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:35.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.