Truck & Bus Forum Truck & Bus Forum
06:55
Welcome to the Truck & Bus Forums
Welcome!A very warm welcome to truckandbusforum.com, a completely FREE online community for people worldwide with an interest in vintage and modern trucks and buses.

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Please feel free to join by clicking HERE.

Go Back   Truck & Bus Forum > Other Road Transport > Military Vehicles
Home Register Gallery FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 27th August 2009, 19:39
G-CPTN G-CPTN is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Tynedale
Age: 80
Posts: 3,698
Images: 209
Austin Champ.

As a result of following URLs about Austin Sheerlines, I have had a misconception 'destroyed'. I always thought that the Rolls Royce engine fitted to the Van den Plas 4-litre R was also the engine fitted to the Austin Champ.
In fact that is not true. Although the Champ engine (at least in the military versions) was, indeed, designed (and originally built) by Rolls Royce, this was a mere 2.8 litre capacity and was only four cylinders whereas the car engine was six cylinders.
True that the basic B-series engine design was common, but the 4-litre engine was cast in aluminium (and, is, apparently, a fine engine - if meticulously maintained) and had altered stroke:-
http://www.redlemon.co.za/vandenplasprincess/rolls.html

However, the purpose of this thread is to expand knowledge of the Champ (after all, this forum is dedicated to trucks and buses rather than passenger cars).
I'll start with the Wiki entry:-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austin_Champ
and invite others to contribute links to photographs or text articles.

You might want to search for the Wolseley Mudlark . . .

http://enc.slq.qld.gov.au/slq/neg/pr...00/116058p.jpg

If there is little (or no) response, then I might have to contribute myself.

Oh - and if you have already read the above Wiki link, you will know that most of the civilian Champs were fitted with the 2.66 litre Austin Atlantic engine . . .

Then there was the Austin Gipsy.

Last edited by G-CPTN; 27th August 2009 at 19:51.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 31st August 2009, 10:55
Western SMT Western SMT is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,417
Images: 76
From what I remember of them they were not looked upon favourably (oil leaks I think) and the cheaper Land Rover soon became popular.

Last edited by Western SMT; 31st August 2009 at 12:53.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 31st August 2009, 11:46
G-CPTN G-CPTN is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Tynedale
Age: 80
Posts: 3,698
Images: 209
Indeed - they lost oil from the axles (hubs?) and that destroyed the gears.

As you stated, the Land Rover did 90% of the jobs that the Champ could at half the price (and cheaper on maintenance).

Champ was too 'sophisticated'.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 31st August 2009, 12:21
coastie coastie is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Holyhead again.
Posts: 1,507
Images: 289
Send a message via Skype™ to coastie
Austin Champ! Now there's a name I haven't heard of for a while. I'm not familiar with those at all.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 31st August 2009, 20:46
dmackay's Avatar
dmackay dmackay is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: north scotland
Age: 81
Posts: 315
Images: 893
Anyone remember the Austin Gipsy (drive shafts )
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 31st August 2009, 23:07
coastie coastie is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Holyhead again.
Posts: 1,507
Images: 289
Send a message via Skype™ to coastie
Very vaguely!!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 31st August 2009, 23:25
G-CPTN G-CPTN is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Tynedale
Age: 80
Posts: 3,698
Images: 209
Quote:
The Gipsy was visually similar to the Land Rover, but unlike the Land Rover, the Gipsy's bodywork was steel and suffered badly from rust in the outdoors off-road environment it was intended for. The suspension was sophisticated - independent suspension all round, using 'Flexitor' rubber springs. Later models used leaf springs on the front and rear which was felt to offer a greatly improved ride over rough surfaces.
From:- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austin_Gipsy
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 1st September 2009, 11:28
coastie coastie is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Holyhead again.
Posts: 1,507
Images: 289
Send a message via Skype™ to coastie
What is a Landrovers' body made of then?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 1st September 2009, 11:34
G-CPTN G-CPTN is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Tynedale
Age: 80
Posts: 3,698
Images: 209
Aluminium . . .
Quote:
The bodywork was hand-made out of surplus aircraft grade aluminium, mainly an aluminium/magnesium alloy called Birmabright, to save on steel, which was closely rationed.
More at:- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Land_Rover_Series
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 1st September 2009, 12:23
coastie coastie is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Holyhead again.
Posts: 1,507
Images: 289
Send a message via Skype™ to coastie
But, I thought you could weld onto a Landrover body??
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:55.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.